Fire Safety in Care Homes Seminar: 24 April, London

12 March 2018

An event intended to provide fire safety management guidance for premises with staff that provide 24 hour care for residents.

Recent news reported in Fire & Risk Management has brought to light the potential consequences for care homes which fail to implement sufficient 'fire saftey protocol'.  Full article featured below.

Following the positive feedback The FPA received from its webinar, 'Fire Saftey in Residential Care Homes' a one day event has been commissioned to provide fire safety management guidance to premises with staff that provide 24 hour care for residents. This promises to be an insightful and educational event and will take place on 24 April at 99 City Road Conference Centre, London. 

Learning outcomes include: 

A clear understanding of the legislative requirements 

An understanding of how to complete your fire risk assessment, or how to audit the person undertaking your fire risk assessment 

The identification of specific fire risks in care homes 

The importance of staff training 

Advice on creating your evacuation strategy 

The opportunity to discuss your own personal circumstances with experts 

Book now

A recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report for a Bolton care home found it had a ‘lack of fire safety protocol’.

The Bolton News reported on the CQC report into Take A Break With Choices, a home in The Haulgh, which it placed into ‘special measures’ after an investigation. Resident safety was said to have been ‘compromised’ in the home, which failed to ‘adhere to infection procedures’ and featured a ‘lack of fire safety protocol’.

After an investigation in August this year, the CQC noted that there was ‘no evidence of a fire risk assessment, testing of emergency equipment or fire drills taking place. We noted that some fire doors were propped open. The registered manager was unaware that personal emergency evacuation plans should be in place’.

The home provides respite care for up to seven people, with Bolton Council stating that the report was ‘disappointing and concerning’, suspending placements there, though the home’s management responded that the report was ‘demonstrably wrong and misleading’, and its ‘outraged’ staff questioned the accuracy of the report as well.

In its response, the home stated the report was ‘not fair and balanced’, having only taken ‘into account the views of one resident’, and its manager alleged a ‘conflict of interest’ as she knew the CQC inspector. 

To find more articles like this go to

Fire Safety in Care Homes Seminar: 24 April, London